home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.paonline.com!haines
- From: Haines@Atomiccafe.com (Harry W. Haines, III)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: verdict on USR 33.6 upgrade chip?
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 96 19:42:31 GMT
- Organization: Pennsylvania Online [Usenet News Server for Hire]
- Message-ID: <4i78ed$87u@news.paonline.com>
- References: <4fqgud$8sr@milo.freenet.vancouver.bc.ca> <4g2niv$94@news.ais.net> <312877CA.A1A@fishnet.net> <gene.115.0012B748@mcs.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.214.57.151
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.0 Beta #0
-
- In article <gene.115.0012B748@mcs.net>, gene@mcs.net (Gene) wrote:
- >In article <312877CA.A1A@fishnet.net> John White <jwhite@fishnet.net> writes:
- >>From: John White <jwhite@fishnet.net>
- >>Subject: Re: verdict on USR 33.6 upgrade chip?
- >> Jim, A lot of us are seeing that our connect speeds to non-V34+
- >>modems have actually gone DOWN with the latest ROMs about 2400 on
- >>average. Seems a few new bugs have been introduced in the V34
- >>implementation.
- >
- >
- >Ill second that what gives. Is their a good init string that we could use
- >through Win 95 dialup?
-
- The best init you could give it is a trip back to where you bought it
- and return it!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Their new modems are buggy and they
- refuse to support them.
-
-
- -----
- | Harry Haines, SWL'er (Haines@Atomiccafe.com) Houston, Texas USA |
- | Southwest Radio Club & Houston Hockey Hotline (713)977-5775 |
-